Categories: Court Info

What Happens After Slander per se? Your Legal Guide

Meta Description: Understand the immediate legal consequences and procedural steps following a claim of Slander per se. Learn about filing requirements, damages, and defense strategies from a professional perspective.

Decoding Slander per se: From Insult to Legal Action

The spoken word holds significant power, and in the legal world, certain statements are considered so inherently damaging that they fall into a category known as Slander per se. Unlike typical defamation claims, where a plaintiff must prove actual financial harm (special damages), Slander per se is assumed to cause injury, simplifying the path to litigation.

What is Slander per se?
It refers to a defamatory statement that is broadcasted verbally and is so obviously harmful that it is presumed to cause damage without the need for additional proof of loss. The statement must fall into one of a few specific categories.

If you or your business have been affected by such a statement, or if you are being accused of making one, understanding the steps that follow is crucial. This professional guide breaks down the immediate aftermath and the procedural roadmap of a Slander per se case.

The Four Pillars of Slander per se

Slander per se is typically established if the defamatory statement falsely alleges one of the following four things about the plaintiff:

Criminal Activity: Accusing someone of committing a serious crime (involving moral turpitude or a felony).
Loathsome Disease: Falsely stating someone has a serious, contagious, and presently existing disease (historically venereal disease or leprosy).
Professional Misconduct: Harmful statements related to a person’s trade, office, profession, or business. This is often the most common category in business disputes.
Unchastity (Sexual Misconduct): Allegations of serious sexual misconduct, often relating to a woman’s virtue (though modern application may be broader).

💡 Legal Expert Tip: Documenting the Slander

If you are the injured party, immediately document the exact words used, the time, date, location, and the names of any witnesses. Slander is fleeting, and witness testimony is critical for proving the statement was made (the “publication” element).

Immediate Aftermath: Cease and Desist, and Investigation

Following a Slander per se incident, the initial steps are critical for both the alleged victim and the alleged defamer.

1. The Injured Party’s Steps (Plaintiff-to-be)

Gather Evidence: Collect witness statements, and any communication (emails, texts) related to the slander.
Legal Consultation: Seek counsel from a legal expert immediately to determine if the statement truly meets the high bar of Slander per se.
The Demand Letter: Often, the first formal step is a cease and desist or retraction demand letter. This document, drafted by a legal expert, formally notifies the defamer of the claim and demands an immediate stop to the statements and, frequently, a public retraction.

2. The Accused Party’s Steps (Defendant-to-be)

Do Not Engage: The first rule is to stop all communication regarding the alleged defamatory statement. Any subsequent statements could strengthen the plaintiff’s case.
Preserve Evidence: Retain any evidence that could support a defense (e.g., proof of truth, privilege).
Consultation: Review the demand letter with a legal expert to assess the claim’s validity and prepare potential defenses.

Procedural Roadmap: Filing a Civil Lawsuit

If the demand letter fails to resolve the issue, the injured party may initiate a civil lawsuit in the relevant jurisdiction, typically focusing on a Tort claim.

Key Stages in a Defamation Suit
Stage	Description
Pleadings	The plaintiff files the Complaint (or Petition), detailing the elements of Slander per se. The defendant files an Answer.
Discovery	The parties exchange evidence through Interrogatories, Requests for Production of Documents, and Depositions. This phase confirms if the statement was made and what defenses exist.
Motions	Parties may file Motions (e.g., Motion for Summary Judgment) attempting to resolve the case before a full Trial or Hearing.
Trial/Settlement	The case proceeds to a Jury or Bench Trial, or more commonly, settles out of court.

Case Context (Anonymized)

A small business owner was falsely accused by a competitor of embezzling funds (allegation of criminal activity and professional misconduct). Because the statement met the criteria for Slander per se, the business owner was not required to prove that customers left specifically because of the statement. The court presumed damage to the professional reputation, focusing the trial on whether the statement was false and was indeed made (published) to a third party.

Damages and Defenses in Slander per se Claims

1. Damages (The “Per se” Advantage)

The key difference is the presumption of General Damages. These cover non-monetary losses like injury to reputation, humiliation, and mental anguish. The plaintiff does not need to show receipts for these. If the plaintiff can prove specific financial loss, they can also seek Special Damages (e.g., lost contracts, income). In cases of malice, Punitive Damages may also be awarded to punish the defamer.

⚠️ Caution: The Public Figure Standard

If the plaintiff is a public official or public figure, the legal standard is much higher. They must prove the statement was made with ‘actual malice’—knowledge that the statement was false or reckless disregard of whether it was false or not.

2. Common Defenses

A defendant has several defenses available to counter a Slander per se claim:

Truth: The most complete defense. If the statement is substantially true, there is no defamation.
Privilege: Certain communication contexts (e.g., testimony in court, legislative debate) are absolutely protected.
Opinion vs. Fact: Defamation must be a false statement of fact, not merely an expression of opinion.
Lack of Publication: Proving the statement was never made to a third party.

Summary of Legal Action Post-Slander per se

Key Takeaways for Action

The ‘Per se’ Benefit: The plaintiff is generally relieved of the burden of proving actual financial harm (special damages) to recover compensation for reputational harm.
Immediate Documentation is Key: For both parties, preserving the context, witnesses, and exact phrasing of the alleged statement is the first and most critical step.
Pleadings Initiate the Suit: A civil suit starts with the Complaint, leading into the evidence-gathering phase of Discovery.
Defenses Focus on Truth or Context: The defendant’s main strategy will likely revolve around proving the statement was true or was made in a legally privileged context.

Post-Slander per se Action Card

A claim of Slander per se streamlines the burden of proof for the plaintiff, presuming damage to reputation. This makes the initial legal maneuvering—from the cease and desist demand to the filing of the Complaint (or Petition)—highly sensitive. Legal guidance is essential to navigate the civil procedure, which involves Discovery, Motions, and eventual Trial or settlement. Focus is often placed on the four categories of per se and the defendant’s defense of Truth or Privilege.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What is the difference between Slander and Libel?

Slander is defamation in a transitory form, most commonly spoken (oral). Libel is defamation in a fixed form, such as written text, print, video, or electronic media.

Must I prove financial loss in a Slander per se case?

No. The primary legal benefit of Slander per se is the presumption of General Damages (injury to reputation, humiliation), meaning you do not need to prove specific financial loss (Special Damages). However, if you want to recover Special Damages, you must prove them.

Can a retraction stop the lawsuit?

A timely and prominent retraction may significantly mitigate the damages awarded, and in some jurisdictions, it is a prerequisite for seeking punitive damages. However, it does not automatically stop the lawsuit, which remains an option for the injured party.

What if the defamatory statement was made online?

Online statements are typically classified as Libel because they are in a fixed, written format (Information and Communication Network/Cyber sphere), even if they were originally spoken and then transcribed (e.g., a video transcript or a social media post).

What is ‘Actual Malice’ and when does it apply?

Actual malice means the statement was made with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not. This higher burden of proof is required when the plaintiff is a public figure or public official.

*AI-Generated Content Disclaimer: This post provides general legal information and is not a substitute for professional legal advice or consultation. Specific facts and local jurisdiction laws can significantly impact the outcome of any case.

Tort, Slander, Libel, Defamation, Civil Cases, Trials & Hearings, Petitions, Motions, Appellate Briefs, How-to Guides, Contracts, Legal Forms, Affidavits, Checklists, Filing & Motions, Legal Procedures, Case Law, Supreme Court, Federal Courts, Statutes & Codes, Legal Resources

geunim