The Only Crime Defined in the Constitution: Treason

Treason is often referred to as the ultimate act of betrayal—a profound offense against one’s own nation. In the United States, this crime holds a unique place in the legal framework as the only crime explicitly defined within the Constitution itself, found in Article III, Section 3. This deliberate, narrow definition by the Framers was a vital safeguard intended to prevent the government from misusing the charge for political oppression, a practice common under English common law.

Unlike other federal crimes, the threshold for a treason conviction is exceptionally high. This post will explore the precise constitutional definition of treason, the stringent evidence requirements, the severe penalties involved, and why, despite its dramatic nature, the crime is so rarely charged in modern American jurisprudence.

The Constitutional Definition of Treason

The U.S. Constitution limits the scope of treason to just two categories of action. According to Article III, Section 3, Treason against the United States “shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort”. This precise language restricts both Congress and the courts from broadening the crime’s definition.

1. Levying War

The phrase “levying war” is generally interpreted to mean the actual assemblage of people for the purpose of executing a treasonable design, such as attempting to overthrow the government by force. Mere conspiracy or plotting is not enough; there must be an open, armed action against the United States. This interpretation was established early in U.S. history during the famous 1807 trial of former Vice President Aaron Burr, where Chief Justice John Marshall confined the meaning of the phrase to the actual waging of war.

2. Adhering to Enemies, Giving Aid and Comfort

The second category involves providing material support to a nation or government with whom the United States is officially at war. Giving “aid and comfort” is more than just providing assistance that is “casually useful”; it must be an act that is essential to the enemy’s design, strengthening them or weakening the United States. The key is the defendant’s specific intent.

The Strict Standard of Proof: The Two-Witness Rule

To secure a conviction for treason, the Constitution imposes a standard of evidence unlike almost any other crime. A person cannot be convicted unless:

1. On the Testimony of Two Witnesses to the Same Overt Act.
2. On Confession in Open Court.

This two-witness rule is a crucial constitutional safeguard. It ensures that an innocent person cannot be convicted based on the testimony of a single biased or self-interested witness. The witnesses must observe the same physical act that manifests the treasonous intent.

Penalties and Related Federal Offenses

As codified in 18 U.S. Code § 2381, the punishment for a federal treason conviction is severe. Treason is one of the few federal crimes for which capital punishment is an option.

Penalty Category	Requirement (18 U.S.C. § 2381)
Maximum Sentence	Death
Minimum Sentence	Imprisonment not less than five years and a fine of not less than $10,000
Loss of Office	Incapability of holding any office under the United States

Why Treason is Rarely Charged

Despite being a foundational crime, treason charges are exceedingly rare, with only a handful of convictions in U.S. history. This is due to the difficult burden of proof imposed by the two-witness rule and the constitutional limitations. Federal prosecutors often opt for related charges which are easier to prove and carry similar, though not always as severe, penalties.

Summary: Key Takeaways on Treason

1. Treason is the only crime defined in the U.S. Constitution, limited to “levying War” or “giving Aid and Comfort” to enemies.
2. Conviction requires both a physical “overt act” and the specific “intent to betray” the United States.
3. A conviction can only be secured on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or by confession in open court, a unique constitutional requirement.
4. The penalties are severe, including a minimum of five years imprisonment and a potential death sentence, as codified in 18 U.S. Code § 2381.
5. The high burden of proof makes the crime extremely rare; prosecutors more commonly pursue related charges like Sedition and Espionage.

---

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Is criticism of the government considered “aid and comfort” to an enemy?

A: No. The Supreme Court has clarified that actions like criticizing the government or organizing a strike, even in wartime, do not constitute treason unless there is a clear, specific intent to betray the United States and the act materially assists an enemy. Treason requires an overt act and the intent to aid an enemy of the U.S..

Q: Were Julius and Ethel Rosenberg charged with treason?

A: No. Despite often being referred to as “traitors,” Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were convicted and executed for conspiracy to commit espionage, not for treason. This illustrates the common practice of federal prosecutors using related statutes that do not carry the Constitution’s stringent two-witness rule.

Q: Can a non-citizen be charged with federal treason?

A: The federal statute (18 U.S. Code § 2381) specifies that treason applies to “Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States“