The Intersection of Alabama DWOL, Motions, and Restitution

Driving in Alabama is considered a privilege, not a right, and maintaining a valid driver’s license is a core requirement for operating a motor vehicle on public roadways. A charge of Driving Without a License (DWOL) in Alabama is a misdemeanor, typically codified under Alabama Code § 32-6-18, and it comes with fines, fees, and court costs. However, the mention of “restitution” in connection with a simple DWOL charge often causes confusion for those facing the court system.

A motion to dismiss is a critical tool in a defendant’s legal strategy, and its success hinges on procedural defects, legal insufficiency, or compliance efforts. This post will clarify the nature of the DWOL offense, the standard grounds for dismissal, and the specific legal context of restitution under Alabama law, explaining why a direct “motion to dismiss restitution” for a standalone DWOL offense is generally a unique and complex legal maneuver.

Alabama’s DWOL vs. DWLS Distinction

The first step in understanding the charge is distinguishing between two primary unlicensed driving offenses in Alabama, as their penalties and potential for collateral damages (which may trigger restitution) vary significantly:

Offense Type	Legal Basis & Classification	Typical Penalty
Driving Without a License (DWOL)	Misdemeanor (Ala. Code § 32-6-18(a))	Fine of $10–$100, plus a $50 traffic fund penalty
Driving While Suspended/Revoked (DWLS/R)	Misdemeanor (Ala. Code § 32-6-19)	Fine of $100–$500 and up to 180 days in jail

A simple DWOL charge pertains to a driver who has never properly obtained a license or whose license has expired, not one whose license was revoked for a serious offense like DUI. The initial penalty for a first-time DWOL violation is primarily a financial punishment consisting of fines and court fees, which are not considered restitution.

The Motion to Dismiss and Defense Strategies

A motion to dismiss is a formal request to the court to throw out a charge before a trial, usually based on a legal defect. For a DWOL charge, successful motions often leverage one of two main arguments:

1. Legal or Procedural Defects

The defense can argue that the initial traffic stop itself was illegal, violating the defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights. A successful Motion to Suppress Evidence (or “fruit of the poisonous tree” argument) would invalidate the basis for the stop, leading to the dismissal of all evidence gathered, including the discovery that the driver was unlicensed. If the officer lacked reasonable suspicion or probable cause for the stop, a skilled Legal Expert will file this motion.

2. Post-Citation Compliance

While not a guarantee of dismissal, obtaining a valid license after the citation but before the court date is a highly effective mitigating factor. In many Alabama municipal and district courts, prosecutors may agree to reduce the misdemeanor charge to a non-criminal infraction or dismiss the case entirely, often conditioned upon the payment of court costs and fees, or completion of a deferred disposition program.

Restitution: The Pecuniary Loss Requirement in Alabama

The primary source of confusion regarding a “motion to dismiss restitution” for a DWOL charge lies in the strict legal definition of restitution in Alabama. Restitution is governed by Alabama Code § 15-18-67 and is intended to be a compensatory measure, not a punitive fine.

The Standard for Restitution

Alabama law is clear: the court is obligated to hold a restitution hearing only when a defendant is convicted of a crime that “resulted in pecuniary damages or loss to a victim”.

DWOL vs. Restitution: A simple DWOL violation is a crime against the state’s licensing regulation. It does not, by its nature, create an identifiable victim who has suffered a direct, pecuniary loss. Therefore, in the vast majority of cases where the only charge is DWOL, a court cannot legally impose an order for restitution. The financial penalties imposed are fines, fees, and court costs, which are owed to the State, not a victim.

When DWOL and Restitution Do Overlap

The only scenario where restitution becomes relevant in an unlicensed driving case is if the driving offense was connected to a separate criminal act that caused harm. For instance:

1. The unlicensed driver causes a vehicle accident that results in property damage or physical injury to another person.
2. The driver is charged with DWOL (a compliance crime) and a crime resulting in loss, such as assault or reckless endangerment.

In this situation, the court would order restitution for the medical bills, property damage, or lost wages of the victim, as mandated by Alabama law. The restitution is tied to the damage caused, not the mere lack of a license.

The “Motion to Dismiss Restitution” Argument

If a court erroneously imposes a restitution order for a simple DWOL charge that did not involve any accident, injury, or property damage, the defendant’s Legal Expert must file an objection and argue that the order is a mistake of law. The core of this motion would be:

• The charge of Driving Without a License (Ala. Code § 32-6-18) is a victimless compliance crime.
• There is no “identified victim” who suffered “pecuniary damages or loss” as a result of the offense.
• Therefore, the order for restitution violates the requirements of the Alabama Mandatory Restitution Act (Ala. Code § 15-18-67 et seq.).

If the restitution order is tied to a related charge (like property damage following an accident), the motion would not seek to dismiss the restitution outright, but rather to ensure the amount is accurately calculated based on verifiable pecuniary losses, and that the defendant’s ability to pay is considered by the court.

Summary of Key Legal Points

1. Simple DWOL is a Misdemeanor: A conviction for DWOL (Ala. Code § 32-6-18) results in a fine ($10-$100) and fees, not standard restitution.
2. Restitution Requires a Victim and Pecuniary Loss: Restitution under Alabama law (Ala. Code § 15-18-67) must compensate an “identified victim” for a financial or property loss directly resulting from the crime.
3. Motions to Dismiss Focus on Legality: A successful motion to dismiss often argues an illegal traffic stop (Motion to Suppress) or leverages the defendant’s post-citation acquisition of a valid license.
4. Arguing Against Restitution: If restitution is ordered for a standalone DWOL offense, the defense argues that the charge does not meet the “pecuniary loss” requirement of the Restitution Act.
5. Ability to Pay is Key: For any imposed fine or restitution, the court must consider the defendant’s ability to pay and cannot use indigence as a sole basis for incarceration.

---

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q1: Is a DWOL charge a felony in Alabama?

A: No. In Alabama, Driving Without a License (DWOL) is classified as a misdemeanor. The penalties include fines and court fees, which can be up to $100 plus an additional $50 penalty for the traffic fund, along with court costs. It is distinct from Driving While Suspended or Revoked (DWLS/R), which carries steeper penalties but is still a misdemeanor for a first offense.

Q2: Can I get my DWOL charge dismissed by getting a license?

A: While obtaining a valid license after the citation does not automatically guarantee dismissal, it is one of the strongest mitigating factors. Presenting a newly valid license to the prosecutor may persuade them to reduce the charge to a non-criminal infraction or dismiss it entirely, often in exchange for paying court fees or completing a deferred disposition.

Q3: What is the difference between a fine and restitution?

A: A fine is a punishment or penalty paid to the State for violating the law (punitive). Restitution is a payment made to an identified victim to cover their direct financial (pecuniary) losses resulting from the crime (compensatory). Restitution is mandatory in Alabama only when a crime results in a pecuniary loss to a victim (Ala. Code § 15-18-67).

Q4: What if I can’t afford to pay the court fines and fees?

A: Under Alabama Rule of Criminal Procedure 26.11, the court must consider your financial resources and ability to pay when imposing fines and setting payment plans. Crucially, you cannot be incarcerated solely because you are unable to pay fines, fees, or restitution, unless the court finds your failure to pay was willful.

Navigating misdemeanor traffic offenses in Alabama, especially when terms like “restitution” are involved, requires a careful and precise legal understanding. Whether you are facing a simple DWOL charge or a more complex scenario involving an accident, retaining a qualified Legal Expert is the most prudent step to protect your rights, explore grounds for a motion to dismiss, and ensure any financial obligations are legally justified under Alabama statute.

Alabama Driving without license, Motion to Dismiss, Restitution, Alabama Code 32-6-18, Misdemeanor traffic offense, Pecuniary damages, Criminal, DUI, Statutes & Codes, State Courts, Motions, Legal Procedures, Criminal Cases, Traffic violation defense, Court appearance, Reinstatement fee, Legal Expert, Sentence and Punishment, Probation condition, Driving while suspended