The Cross-Claim: Suing Your Co-Defendant in a Lawsuit

Navigating a lawsuit involving multiple parties can quickly become complex. While the initial focus is on the claim filed by the plaintiff, defendants in a case often have claims not just against the plaintiff, but against each other. This is where the powerful procedural tool known as the cross-claim comes into play.

Contrary to popular belief, a lawsuit is not always a simple two-sided battle. A cross-claim transforms the litigation landscape, allowing parties on the same side—typically co-defendants—to resolve their disputes concurrently with the original case. Understanding this mechanism is crucial for anyone facing multi-party litigation, as it dictates strategy, liability, and the final distribution of damages.

What Exactly Is a Cross-Claim?

In legal terms, a cross-claim is an action filed by one party against a co-party. The most common scenario involves a defendant asserting a claim against a co-defendant. Less frequently, a plaintiff might file a cross-claim against another co-plaintiff, though this is rare in practice.

The key defining feature is the relationship between the parties: they must be on the same side of the “v.” in the case caption. For example, if John sues both Company A and Company B, a claim filed by Company A against Company B is a cross-claim.

The “Same Transaction or Occurrence” Rule

A cross-claim is not a free pass to sue your co-party over an unrelated matter. To be permissible, the claim must satisfy a strict relevance requirement, typically mandated by court rules like Rule 13(g) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP).

Requirement: The cross-claim must arise out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the original action or of a counterclaim therein.

This rule ensures that the claim is logically connected to the main dispute, promoting judicial efficiency by resolving all related issues in a single proceeding.

Cross-Claim vs. Counterclaim vs. Third-Party Claim: Clarifying the Claims

The concepts of cross-claims, counterclaims, and third-party claims are often confused. While all involve one party suing another within the context of an existing lawsuit, they are distinguished by the identity of the party being sued.

Type of Claim	Filed By	Filed Against	Key Distinction
Cross-Claim	Defendant (or Plaintiff)	Co-Defendant (or Co-Plaintiff)	Against a co-party on the same side.
Counterclaim	Defendant	Plaintiff	Against an opposing party.
Third-Party Claim (Impleader)	Defendant (Third-Party Plaintiff)	Non-Party to the lawsuit	Brings a new party into the case.

Procedural Requirements for Filing a Cross-Claim

A cross-claim is typically asserted within the defendant’s answer to the original complaint. It operates as a pleading, much like a complaint, and the co-party who is sued (the cross-defendant) must respond to it.

Summary: Key Takeaways for Multi-Party Litigation

1. A cross-claim is a claim by one party against a co-party (e.g., co-defendant against co-defendant) within the same civil procedure lawsuit.
2. It must arise out of the same transaction or occurrence as the original claim to be properly filed, ensuring related disputes are resolved efficiently.
3. The primary purpose is often to assert claims for indemnification or contribution, effectively shifting or sharing potential liability for the plaintiff’s damages.
4. Unlike a counterclaim (against the opposing party/plaintiff), a cross-claim keeps the action among parties on the same side.
5. Filing a cross-claim is typically permissive, not compulsory, but once filed, it becomes a crucial part of the case and must be fully litigated.

---

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What is the difference between a cross-claim and a third-party claim?

A cross-claim is filed against a party already in the lawsuit (a co-party), whereas a third-party claim (impleader) is filed against a person or entity not yet involved in the lawsuit (a non-party) who may be liable to the defendant for the plaintiff’s claim.

Are cross-claims compulsory?

No, cross-claims are generally permissive, meaning a party may assert them, but is usually not required to do so. Under Federal Rule 13(g), the language states a party “may state as a cross-claim”. This differs from some compulsory counterclaims.

Can a plaintiff file a cross-claim?

Yes, a plaintiff may technically file a cross-claim against a co-plaintiff (if there are multiple plaintiffs), provided the claim arises out of the same transaction or occurrence as the original suit. However, this scenario is much less common than a defendant cross-claiming against a co-defendant.

What is the key rule that governs cross-claims?

In the Federal Courts, cross-claims are primarily governed by Rule 13(g) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP). State courts have similar rules, often modeled after the FRCP.

cross-claim, counterclaim, co-party, co-defendant, Rule 13, indemnification, contribution, civil procedure, lawsuit, litigation, Federal Courts, State Courts, Court Rules, Civil, Legal Procedures, Filing & Motions, Case Law, Statutes & Codes, Tort, Contract