Judicial Activism - Geunim

The Philosophy of Judicial Restraint vs. Activism

Meta Description: A Deep Dive into Judicial Restraint Judicial restraint is a profound legal philosophy advocating for judges to limit the exercise of their own power, deferring to the legislative and executive branches. This principle, central to the debate of Judicial Activism vs Judicial Restraint, emphasizes adherence to the original text of the law, Stare […]

Checks and Balances, constitutional law, Judicial Activism, Judicial Minimalism, Judicial Philosophy, judicial restraint, judicial review, Legal Expert, Legal Precedent, Living Constitution, originalism, Originalist Loose, Plain Meaning Rule, predictability, rule of law, separation of powers, stare decisis, Textual, Textualism, without elaborate

The Lochner Era: How Substantive Due Process Reshaped US Law

Post Overview: Economic Liberty and the Constitution This post delves into the Lochner Era (1905–1937), a critical period in U.S. constitutional history defined by the Supreme Court’s expansive interpretation of Substantive Due Process to protect economic liberty and the freedom of contract against government regulation. Few periods in American jurisprudence spark as much debate and

a bakery owner, Bakeshop Act, case law, constitutional law, consumer protection, Due Process Clause, Economic Liberty, Fourteenth Amendment, Freedom of Contract, Judicial Activism, judicial review, liberty, Liberty of Contract, Lochner Era, Marriage, maximum hours, New Deal Era, Notice, or property, police powers, rather than economic, Rational Basis Test, safety, though controversial, unenumerated rights, unnecessary