Protecting Your Trade Secret: What Are “Reasonable Efforts”?

A trade secret is arguably the most powerful form of intellectual property (IP), offering potentially infinite protection—but only if you actively protect it. Unlike patents or copyrights, which require official registration, a trade secret is protected solely by its secrecy and its commercial value to your business. This leads to the critical legal requirement that the information must be “subject to efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy”.

This phrase, central to both the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA) and the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA), is a crucial legal test. It is a fact-specific inquiry that courts use to determine whether a company deserves legal protection against misappropriation. In simple terms, if you don’t treat your information like a secret, the law won’t either. For business owners and executives, understanding and implementing these “reasonable efforts” is the non-negotiable step to safeguarding your company’s most valuable, confidential assets.

The Three Non-Negotiable Requirements for Trade Secret Status

For any piece of information—whether a formula, a method, or a customer compilation—to qualify as a legally protectable trade secret, three elements must be met. If any one of these pillars falls, the entire protection collapses.

• 1. Secrecy: The information must not be generally known or readily ascertainable by proper means by others who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use. This means it is not public knowledge within the industry circles that normally deal with this kind of information.
• 2. Economic Value from Secrecy: The information must derive independent economic value because it is a secret. If the information were to become public, the holder would lose a competitive edge.
• 3. Reasonable Efforts to Maintain Secrecy: The information must be the subject of active, concrete steps taken by the owner to keep it secret. This is the action-oriented requirement that courts scrutinize most closely in misappropriation claims.

Deconstructing the Legal Standard: ‘Reasonable Under the Circumstances’

The term “reasonable” is flexible, ensuring that a small startup is not held to the same standard as a multinational corporation with unlimited resources. Courts determine reasonableness based on the totality of the circumstances, considering:

• The value and importance of the secret to the company.
• The company’s size, resources, and level of sophistication.
• The ease or difficulty with which the information could be properly acquired by others (e.g., reverse engineering).

While an “impenetrable fortress” is not required, mere passive hope is insufficient. The steps must be affirmative and, critically, consistently enforced.

A Practical 5-Point Action Plan for Maintaining Secrecy

To successfully meet the “reasonable efforts” test, an organization must implement a multi-layered security program covering contractual, physical, and digital safeguards. Consistency and documentation are paramount.

Action Area	Reasonable Measures Checklist
1. Contractual Measures	Require all personnel (employees, contractors) and third parties (vendors, partners) to sign specific Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) or confidentiality clauses.
2. Physical & Digital Access Control	Implement the “need-to-know” principle, limiting access to information to only essential individuals. Use password protection, segregated network storage, and physical lock-and-key for sensitive areas.
3. Clear Identification & Marking	Conspicuously label all documents, files, and physical items containing trade secret information with clear legends such as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “TRADE SECRET”.
4. Employee Training & Awareness	Provide regular training to all employees with access, outlining the IP policy, defining trade secrets, and emphasizing their continuing obligation to maintain secrecy.
5. Onboarding & Exit Procedures	For departing employees, conduct mandatory exit interviews to reaffirm post-employment confidentiality obligations. Ensure all company property, including digital files, is immediately returned or destroyed.

Case Study: When Passive Protection Fails

Summary: Three Steps to an Enforceable Trade Secret

1. Formalize Protection Contractually: Use specific NDAs and confidentiality agreements for all employees and external parties, explicitly naming or describing the protected information.
2. Implement Physical and Digital Controls: Limit access to a strict need-to-know basis, utilizing physical locks, strong digital passwords, and segregated network storage.
3. Ensure Consistent Enforcement: The key to ‘reasonableness’ is consistency. Train employees regularly, mark documents clearly, and follow strict, documented exit procedures.

---

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q1: Is my customer list a trade secret?

A: It can be. A customer list qualifies as a trade secret if the information on it is not generally known or readily ascertainable from public sources, and the company has taken reasonable steps to keep it secret. If you compiled the list using specialized, difficult-to-obtain data, it is more likely to be protected.

Q2: Does “reasonable efforts” require a company to use every available security measure?

A: No. The efforts are judged on a “reasonable under the circumstances” standard, meaning a court will consider your company’s size, resources, and the value of the secret. You must be diligent, but you are not required to build an “impenetrable fortress”.

Q3: What’s the difference between an NDA and “reasonable efforts?”

A: An NDA (contractual measure) is one of the strongest examples of a reasonable effort. However, an NDA alone is insufficient if not coupled with physical and digital security, clear marking, and consistent enforcement.

Q4: What is the main legal act governing trade secrets in the U.S.?

A: Trade secrets are primarily governed by state law under the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA), adopted by nearly all states, and the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) of 2016, which allows a trade secret holder to file a misappropriation claim in federal court.