Protecting Your Coastal Property: A Guide to Shoreline Law

The allure of waterfront property is undeniable, yet its ownership and development come with a unique and complex legal framework known as Shoreline Law. This area of Property and Regulatory law governs everything from your private boundary line to large-scale coastal development projects. For coastal property owners, real estate developers, and environmental advocates, understanding these laws is crucial for protecting investments and ensuring compliance.

Shoreline Law operates at the intersection of private property rights and public access, often creating tension that leads to disputes. It is defined by centuries-old common law principles, such as the Public Trust Doctrine, and modern legislative acts designed to protect delicate coastal ecosystems.

Key Legal Foundations of Shoreline Law

Two fundamental legal concepts form the backbone of legal rights along the coast and waterways:

1. The Public Trust Doctrine

2. Riparian and Littoral Rights

These are the special rights attached to land bordering a water body. Riparian rights typically refer to river or stream boundaries, while littoral rights refer to lake or ocean boundaries. These rights are considered Property rights, but they are not absolute; they are qualified by the Public Trust Doctrine. Key riparian rights often include:

• The right of access to the water.
• The right to build a dock or pier, subject to permits and regulations.
• The right to use the water (non-consumptive use).

Navigating Coastal Regulation: Federal and State Acts

Overlapping layers of federal and state law create a complex permitting and compliance environment for any activity near the shore. These systems are managed under the umbrella of Statutes & Codes.

The Federal Framework: Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)

The Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) is a federal law that encourages coastal states to develop management programs for their coastal zones. States that comply and have a federally approved program (like Washington, California, or Florida) gain a measure of federal consistency, meaning federal actions must be consistent with the state’s plan.

State-Level Implementation: Master Programs

Many states use their own laws to delegate authority to local governments. For example, Washington State’s Shoreline Management Act (SMA) requires local governments to create Shoreline Master Programs (SMP). These SMPs are the primary tool for managing land use, issuing Coastal development permits, and regulating everything from bulkheads to single-family residences. Compliance involves navigating local Licensing and planning rules.

Critical Issues and Case Law in Coastal Property

The greatest challenges in Shoreline Law often arise when governmental action impacts private property rights, leading to high-stakes Case Law disputes.

The Regulatory “Takings” Issue

The Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states that private property shall not be “taken for public use, without just compensation.” While condemnation (physical taking) is clear, a “regulatory taking” is often debated. This occurs when a governmental regulation, such as a denial of a seawall permit or a restriction on development, is so severe that it strips the property of all economic value. Courts must weigh the public purpose of the regulation against the economic impact on the private owner, an area of law known as Regulatory takings.

Sea-Level Rise and Future Liability

The increasing reality of sea-level rise introduces novel legal questions. As the Mean high-water mark shifts landward, private land may become permanently submerged. When land is submerged, it generally becomes part of the public trust, potentially shifting ownership to the state. This raises issues of liability for abandoned structures and the effectiveness of protective measures like “rolling easements” and building codes that require elevation or future removal.

Summary: Key Takeaways for Coastal Stakeholders

1. Boundary Awareness is Paramount: Coastal property lines are not static; they shift with natural processes like Accretion and erosion. Always use the current Mean high-water mark for accurate determination.
2. The Public Trust is a Limit: The Public Trust Doctrine places a permanent public interest on all tidelands and submerged lands, restricting the absolute nature of private Riparian rights.
3. Permitting is Mandatory: All development requires adherence to state and local regulations (e.g., Shoreline Master Programs (SMP)), and failure to obtain a Coastal development permits can result in significant enforcement actions.
4. Mitigate Regulatory Risk: Property owners must proactively assess how environmental and land-use regulations could lead to a Regulatory takings claim, which requires a deep understanding of relevant Case Law.

---

FAQ: Common Shoreline Legal Questions

Q: What is the difference between accretion and avulsion?

A: Accretion is the slow, gradual gain of land due to natural deposits, and it changes the legal property boundary. Avulsion is the sudden, dramatic loss or gain of land (e.g., after a hurricane), and it generally does not change the legal boundary line.

Q: Does the Public Trust Doctrine allow public access across private land?

A: Generally, no. While the Public Trust Doctrine protects public rights on the submerged lands and tidelands (from the MHW line seaward), accessing those public areas typically does not grant the right to trespass on the private upland area (above the MHW line) without permission, unless a public easement exists.

Q: What is a “Shoreline Master Program” (SMP)?

A: An SMP is a comprehensive land-use plan developed by local governments in coastal states, under state mandates like the Shoreline Management Act (SMA). It provides the specific policies and regulations for development, environmental protection, and public access within the local coastal zone.

Q: If a regulation prevents me from building on my lot, is that a “taking?”

A: Not necessarily. A Regulatory takings claim is usually only successful if the regulation eliminates virtually all economic value or use of the property. Courts use a balancing test, considering the character of the government action and the economic impact on the owner’s distinct investment-backed expectations.

Disclaimer

***

Civil, Contract, Property, Tort, Regulatory, Licensing, Statutes & Codes, Case Law, Legal Procedures, Filing & Motions, Shoreline Management Act (SMA), Public Trust Doctrine, Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA), Mean high-water mark, Riparian rights, Accretion and erosion, Regulatory takings, Shoreline Master Programs (SMP), Coastal development permits, Water rights