Understanding Tortious Interference with Contract

In the competitive commercial landscape, successful business operations rely on strong, enforceable contracts. However, when a third party—a competitor, a former partner, or an outside individual—intentionally disrupts a valid agreement, the resulting financial harm can be substantial. This is where the legal concept of tortious interference with contract comes into play, providing a crucial remedy against wrongful commercial sabotage.

Tortious interference is a common law tort that addresses situations where an outside party intentionally damages a contractual relationship between two others, leading to economic loss. It is distinct from a simple breach of contract, as the lawsuit is filed against the interfering third party, not the party who breached the agreement. Understanding the mechanics of this claim is vital for any business owner seeking to protect their assets and long-term economic interests.

The Essential Elements of a Successful Claim

While the specific requirements for proving tortious interference with contract can vary slightly by jurisdiction, most courts recognize a core set of elements that a plaintiff must establish. Successfully demonstrating these points is the foundation of any litigation seeking damages from an interfering third party.

1. Existence of a Valid Contract: A legally binding, enforceable contract must exist between the plaintiff and a third party.
2. Defendant’s Knowledge: The defendant (the interfering party) must have had actual knowledge of this existing contract. They cannot interfere by mere accident or negligence.
3. Intentional and Improper Interference: The defendant must have intentionally acted to induce a breach or disrupt the performance of the contract. Crucially, the interference must be deemed “improper” or “wrongful.” Improper means often include fraud, misrepresentation, defamation, threats, bribery, or illegal conduct.
4. Actual Breach or Disruption: The interference must have caused the third party to breach the contract or significantly disrupt its performance.
5. Resulting Damages: The plaintiff must have suffered demonstrable financial harm, such as lost profits or increased costs, as a direct result of the breach caused by the defendant’s interference.

Contract vs. Prospective Economic Advantage

Tortious interference claims generally fall into two categories, protecting different stages of a business relationship:

Type of Claim	Requirement	Focus of Protection
Interference with Contract	A valid, existing contract.	The right to benefit from a current agreement.
Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage	A reasonable expectation of a future business relationship.	The right to pursue future business opportunities.

Key Defenses Against an Interference Claim

For a defendant facing an accusation of tortious interference, several powerful defenses can be raised. The central theme in most defenses is a lack of the required intentional and improper conduct, often revolving around the concept of “justification” or “privilege.”

• Justification or Privilege: This is the most common defense. The defendant argues that their interference was justified because they were acting to protect their own legitimate economic interest. For example, a business acting to safeguard a prior contractual right or a creditor enforcing a debt.
• Lawful Competition: If the interference was achieved through fair, ethical, and lawful competitive means (e.g., offering lower prices or superior service), the interference is considered privileged, not tortious.
• Lack of Knowledge/Intent: The defendant can argue that they were genuinely unaware of the specific contract or relationship they allegedly disrupted, or that their actions were not intended to cause a breach.
• Contract Invalidity: If the original contract between the plaintiff and the third party was unenforceable (e.g., illegal, based on fraud, or lacking a necessary element), the claim for interference will fail.
• No Improper Means Used: The defendant can demonstrate that, while they may have interfered, they did not use fraud, coercion, threats, or any other improper or wrongful conduct.

Summary of Legal Protections

Protecting your business from tortious interference requires a proactive approach to contracts and a willingness to engage a legal expert when wrongful conduct is suspected.

1. Tortious interference with contract is a claim against a third party who uses wrongful means to intentionally cause the breach of an existing contract.
2. The elements of the claim center on proving the defendant’s knowledge, intent, improper conduct, and the resulting financial damages.
3. The critical distinction in business law is between lawful competition (protected) and tortious interference (unlawful use of fraud, threats, or other improper means).
4. Defenses often rely on proving that the interference was justified, privileged, or lacked the necessary element of improper intent.

---

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: What is the difference between a breach of contract and tortious interference?

A: A breach of contract is a claim filed against the party with whom you had the contract. Tortious interference is a claim filed against a third party (an outsider) who wrongfully caused the other party to breach that contract.

Q: Can I sue for tortious interference if there was no formal contract?

A: Yes. This is generally covered under the separate but related tort of “tortious interference with prospective economic advantage.” This claim protects your reasonable expectation of a future business relationship or economic gain, even without a signed contract.

Q: Is competition enough to be considered tortious interference?

A: No. Offering a better product, lower price, or superior service is lawful, aggressive competition and is considered a privileged defense. Tortious interference requires the defendant to use improper means, such as fraud, defamation, or illegal activity, to cause the disruption.

Q: What kind of evidence is needed to prove intent?

A: Proving the defendant’s intent often requires direct evidence (like emails, recorded statements, or internal documents) showing they knew about the contract and acted specifically to cause its breach or disruption, usually for a malicious purpose or with a wrongful motive.

Q: What remedies are available if I win a tortious interference claim?

A: You can typically recover compensatory damages for your economic losses, such as lost profits and consequential costs. If the conduct was particularly malicious or egregious, you may also be awarded punitive damages.