Meta: The legal concept of lateral support is a cornerstone of property law, protecting landowners from adjacent excavation that causes soil to collapse. This guide clarifies your rights and your neighbor’s duties regarding land stability, covering both unimproved and improved land, strict liability rules, and steps you can take to protect your property from subsidence.
Owning land grants you a bundle of rights, and one of the most fundamental is the right to keep your land exactly where it is. This is where the powerful, yet often misunderstood, legal doctrine of lateral support comes into play. It’s a critical concept for anyone undertaking construction, excavation, or even significant landscaping near a property line.
Simply put, lateral support is the right of a landowner to have their soil in its natural condition remain in its natural position, supported by the adjacent land. When an adjoining property owner’s actions—such as digging or excavating—cause your land to slide, cave in, or subside, they may be liable for the resulting damage. Understanding this right is vital for protecting the physical integrity of your real estate investment.
The Core Doctrine: Land in its Natural State
The law of lateral support is generally divided into two main categories: support for land in its natural state, and support for land that has been “improved” with buildings or structures.
Strict Liability for Natural Land
At common law, the right to lateral support for land in its natural condition is an absolute right incident to land ownership.
- If an adjacent owner excavates and causes your unimproved land to subside, that owner is held strictly liable for the loss.
- Strict liability means you do not have to prove negligence (lack of care) on the part of the neighbor; you only need to show that their removal of the natural support caused your land to fall.
- The cause of action (the right to sue) generally arises upon the actual subsidence of the land, not merely the start of the excavation.
This principle is rooted in the idea that one landowner should not, by using their own property, cause the inherent value and stability of a neighbor’s land to be destroyed. The duty is a negative one: a duty not to act in a way that impairs a neighbor’s lateral support.
Support for Improved Land: When Buildings are Involved
The rules change significantly when the supported land has been improved with structures like houses, retaining walls, or other buildings. The natural right of lateral support does not extend to the increased weight or pressure exerted by these artificial structures.
The Negligence Standard
If your neighbor’s excavation causes both your land and the building on it to collapse, the neighbor’s liability depends on a crucial distinction:
- If the land would have subsided anyway (even without the weight of the building), the neighbor is strictly liable for the damage to the land and often liable for the damage to the building as well.
- If the weight of the building was the primary cause that contributed to the collapse, the neighbor is typically only liable if you can prove they were negligent in their excavation.
Proving negligence usually requires demonstrating the excavating party failed to use ordinary care, such as failure to give proper notice, employing incompetent workmen, or excavating carelessly.
🛠️ Expert Tip: The Notice Requirement
Many jurisdictions, including some municipal codes, impose a duty on the excavating landowner to provide timely and sufficient notice to the adjoining owner before starting excavation near the boundary line. This allows the adjacent owner time to take protective measures for their own structures. Failing to provide this notice can, in itself, be considered negligence.
Key Property Owner Duties and Recourse
As property owners, you have both rights to assert and duties to observe when dealing with adjacent excavation projects.
The Excavating Owner’s Duty
The landowner who excavates has the right to use their land, but this right is conditioned by the duty to prevent injury to the adjoining property.
- Provide Artificial Support: If the excavation will remove the natural support, the excavating owner must generally furnish an artificial support, like a properly engineered retaining wall, to replace the support they removed.
- Use Care and Skill: Even when the neighbor’s land is improved, the excavating party must use ordinary care and skill to avoid causing damage.
- Comply with Local Codes: Many cities have specific ordinances detailing how close to a property line excavation can occur, and requirements for support structures or notifications, especially for deep digs.
The Adjacent Owner’s Recourse
If you fear your property’s stability is threatened, you don’t have to wait for the damage to occur before acting. You have several legal options:
Case Box: Seeking Immediate Relief
Before any soil movement, a property owner may seek an injunction from the court. An injunction is a court order demanding that the neighbor halt or modify their construction/excavation to prevent irreparable damage to your property. To succeed, you must typically show that without the court’s intervention, you will suffer severe, unrecoverable harm.
If damage has occurred, you can sue for monetary damages, which may cover the cost of repair, the diminution in your property’s fair market value, or the cost to replace the lateral support.
It’s important to remember that even if you own property downhill from an excavation, you have the right to a stable boundary. Disputes over lateral support often require the testimony of professionals, such as soils engineers or civil engineers, to determine the cause and extent of the instability.
Summary of Lateral Support Law
Key Takeaways for Property Owners
- Absolute Right for Natural Land: You have an absolute right to lateral support for your land in its natural state. If a neighbor’s excavation causes unimproved land to subside, the neighbor is strictly liable (no need to prove negligence).
- Negligence for Buildings: If a building’s weight contributes to the collapse, you generally must prove the excavating neighbor was negligent to recover for the damage to the structure.
- Duty to Give Notice: The excavating owner often has a duty to give timely notice of deep excavation to allow the neighbor to protect their structures.
- Seek Injunction: You can seek a court injunction to stop a threatening excavation before damage occurs.
Legal Support Summary Card
Your Property’s Foundation is Protected
| Legal Right | Lateral Support (Common Law) |
| Liability Standard (Natural Land) | Strict Liability |
| Liability Standard (Improved Land) | Negligence (if building weight contributed) |
| Key Duty of Excavator | Provide Artificial Support or Notice |
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: What is the difference between lateral and subjacent support?
A: Lateral support is the support your land receives from the land next to it (side-by-side). Subjacent support is the support your land receives from the strata beneath it, which is relevant in cases involving subsurface mining or extraction of underground deposits. Both are legal rights protecting land stability.
Q: Does the law of lateral support apply if my neighbor hires a contractor?
A: Generally, the landowner who orders the excavation is responsible for damage that is a necessary consequence of the work, even if they hire an independent contractor. The landowner cannot absolve themselves of liability by simply hiring a third party, particularly under the strict liability standard for natural land.
Q: Can I waive my right to lateral support?
A: In some cases, a landowner may agree to a removal of lateral support, for instance, by granting an easement to a railroad or other entity. However, in many jurisdictions, the implicit right to lateral support associated with land ownership in its natural state cannot be entirely waived or renounced through contract.
Q: When does the statute of limitations start for a lateral support claim?
A: The cause of action does not typically accrue until the actual subsidence of the land occurs, not when the excavation work starts. This means the clock for filing a lawsuit begins to run only once the soil has visibly moved or fallen.
Q: My neighbor claims my old fence caused the collapse. Is that relevant?
A: Yes, a fence is considered an improvement/structure, and its weight may be a factor. The burden may shift to the excavating landowner to prove that the weight of your fence (or other structure) was the primary cause of the damage to the soil itself.
Disclaimer: This blog post is generated by an AI legal assistant and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, and you should not rely on it as a substitute for consulting with a qualified Legal Expert. Laws concerning lateral support vary significantly by state and municipality, and an individual consultation is necessary for your specific situation.
Lateral Support,Property,Tort,Civil,Filing & Motions,Case Law,Statutes & Codes,Legal Procedures,Appeals,State Courts,Federal Courts,Court Rules,Property,Wills,Affidavits,Checklists,Filing,How-to Guides,Civil Cases,Compliance Guides,Briefs,Hearings,Trials & Hearings,Motions
Please consult a qualified legal professional for any specific legal matters.