Categories: Court Info

Fraudulent Conveyance: Protecting Your Assets

Learn about fraudulent conveyance, a legal concept designed to prevent the dishonest transfer of assets to evade creditors. We break down the types, legal standards, and what you need to know to protect your financial interests.

Navigating financial challenges can be daunting, especially when debt mounts. While legitimate asset protection is a key part of financial planning, attempting to hide assets from creditors is a serious legal issue known as fraudulent conveyance, or fraudulent transfer. This concept is centuries old, with roots tracing back to a 16th-century English statute. Understanding this legal principle is vital for both debtors and creditors to ensure fairness and transparency in financial dealings.

What is a Fraudulent Conveyance?

A fraudulent conveyance is the transfer of a debtor’s property to another party with the specific intent of placing it beyond the reach of creditors. This is not a criminal charge, but rather a legal action that allows a creditor to void or reverse the transfer. The goal is to restore the asset to the debtor’s estate so it can be used to satisfy the debt. In the United States, every state has its own fraudulent conveyance law, often based on the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA), which applies outside of bankruptcy cases. In bankruptcy, the Bankruptcy Code contains its own provisions for dealing with fraudulent transfers under Section 548.

Tip from a Legal Expert

The term “fraudulent” in this context refers to a civil wrong, not a criminal one. It means the transfer has placed assets out of a creditor’s reach, regardless of criminal intent.

Actual vs. Constructive Fraud

Fraudulent conveyances are typically categorized into two types: actual fraud and constructive fraud.

Actual Fraud: This occurs when a debtor makes a transfer with the explicit intent to “hinder, delay, or defraud” a creditor. Proving this can be challenging, as it requires demonstrating intent, which is a subjective state of mind. However, courts often look for “badges of fraud” to infer intent.
Constructive Fraud: This is a transaction that is legally fraudulent even without a malicious intent. It typically involves two conditions: the debtor receives less than “reasonably equivalent value” for the transfer, and the debtor was either insolvent at the time of the transfer or became insolvent as a result of it. For example, giving away property to a family member for free while facing significant debts could be considered constructive fraud.

Badges of Fraud: Signs of a Fraudulent Transfer

Because proving actual intent is difficult, courts use a non-exhaustive list of circumstantial factors known as “badges of fraud.” These factors help determine if a transfer was made with fraudulent intent.

Case Study: The Debtor’s Disappearing Assets

A debtor facing a lawsuit transfers a vacation home to a close friend for a nominal fee. The transfer happens quickly and secretly, just after the lawsuit is filed. The debtor continues to use the home on weekends. A court would likely view this as an actual fraudulent conveyance, as multiple “badges of fraud” are present: the transfer was to an “insider” (a friend), was of a substantial asset, occurred close to litigation, and the debtor retained control of the property. The court could void the transfer and allow the creditor to attach the property to satisfy their claim.

Common “Badges of Fraud”	Why They Matter
Transfer to an insider (relative, partner)	Suggests a lack of arm’s-length transaction
Debtor retains control of the asset	Implies the transfer was a sham to hide ownership
Transfer occurred after litigation was threatened or filed	Shows a timing connection to the attempt to evade creditors
Transfer was of substantially all the debtor’s assets	Signifies a complete attempt to liquidate assets out of reach

Defenses and Remedies

If a fraudulent conveyance claim is made, the transferee (the person who received the property) may have defenses. The primary defense is that the transfer was made in “good faith” and for “reasonably equivalent value”. If the transferee did not know of the debtor’s fraudulent intent and paid a fair price, the transfer may not be voided. However, if the transfer is successfully challenged, the court can “void” the transfer, return the property to the debtor’s estate, or allow the creditor to attach the property or impose a lien on it.

Summary: Key Takeaways on Fraudulent Conveyance

Fraudulent conveyance is a legal action to recover assets a debtor has transferred to evade creditors.
It exists in two forms: “actual fraud” (based on intent to defraud) and “constructive fraud” (based on inadequate value and insolvency).
Courts use “badges of fraud” to infer fraudulent intent when it is not explicitly stated.
Creditors can seek to void the transfer, attach the property, or impose a lien.
Defenses exist for transferees who act in good faith and provide reasonably equivalent value for the property.

Understanding the Law is Your Best Defense

Whether you are a creditor seeking to recover what is owed to you or a debtor managing your financial affairs, understanding the principles of fraudulent conveyance is essential. Knowing the difference between legitimate asset protection and an illegal transfer can protect you from serious legal consequences.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: Is fraudulent conveyance a crime?

No, fraudulent conveyance is a civil matter, not a criminal one. It focuses on reversing a transaction to ensure creditors can be paid, not on criminal penalties.

Q2: What is the “look-back period” for a fraudulent transfer?

Under the Bankruptcy Code, a transfer must have been made within two years before the bankruptcy filing to be challenged. State laws, such as the UFTA, may have a longer period.

Q3: Can a charitable donation be considered a fraudulent conveyance?

Generally, a charitable contribution is not considered a fraudulent conveyance under the Bankruptcy Code if it does not exceed 15% of the debtor’s gross annual income. However, if the contribution is larger, it can still be considered legitimate if it is consistent with the debtor’s usual charitable practices.

Q4: What if I received property that was a fraudulent conveyance without knowing it?

If you are a “good-faith purchaser” who bought the property for value without knowing about the fraudulent intent, you may be protected. You might be able to retain the property or be granted a lien on it to the extent of the value you paid.

Disclaimer: This blog post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The content is AI-generated based on publicly available information as of September 2025. Laws regarding fraudulent conveyance vary by jurisdiction and are subject to change. Always consult with a qualified legal expert for advice tailored to your specific situation.

fraudulent conveyance, fraudulent transfer, creditors, debtors, asset protection, Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, UFTA, Bankruptcy Code, actual fraud, constructive fraud, badges of fraud, insolvent, reasonably equivalent value, legal expert, assets, liabilities, legal remedies, void transfer, lien

geunim