Meta Description: Understand the difference between extrinsic and intrinsic fraud in legal proceedings. Learn how extrinsic fraud can be grounds for setting aside a court judgment, with practical examples and key legal concepts.
A Guide to Setting Aside a Judgment Based on Fraud or Misrepresentation
Legal proceedings are built on the principle of fairness and truth. When a court issues a judgment, it’s presumed to be the final word on the matter. However, what happens when that judgment is the result of deceit? This is where the concepts of extrinsic and intrinsic fraud become crucial. Understanding the difference is key to knowing whether you have grounds to challenge a final court order.
In this post, we’ll explore these two types of fraud, focusing on why extrinsic fraud is a powerful tool for overturning a judgment and what steps you might take if you believe you have been a victim of such deception.
Extrinsic fraud, also known as fraud on the court, refers to deception that prevents a party from presenting their case in a fair manner. It’s fraud that is external to the issues tried in court. This type of deceit is so serious that it is often considered grounds to set aside a judgment, even long after the case has been closed.
Extrinsic fraud deprives a party of the opportunity to have their day in court. Examples include a party bribing a juror, a witness being prevented from testifying, or a party concealing crucial evidence that the other side had no way of discovering during the trial.
Intrinsic fraud, by contrast, is a form of deception that occurs during the course of the legal proceeding itself and relates to the merits of the case. While it is still a form of wrongdoing, it is generally not considered sufficient to overturn a final judgment because the court is presumed to have already adjudicated on the matter.
| Feature | Extrinsic Fraud | Intrinsic Fraud |
|---|---|---|
| Location of Deception | External to the trial (e.g., preventing a party from appearing) | Internal to the trial (e.g., perjured testimony, forged documents) |
| Impact on Judgment | Can be grounds to set aside a judgment | Generally insufficient to set aside a judgment |
| Remedy | Action in equity (separate lawsuit) | Must be addressed during the trial or on appeal |
Sarah and John are in a property dispute. John, knowing a key witness for Sarah has vital information, convinces the witness to go on an “all-expenses-paid” vacation to a remote island, timed to coincide with the trial. The witness is not a party to the case, and Sarah is unaware of the deception. The court issues a judgment in John’s favor because Sarah’s key witness did not appear.
Sarah later discovers John’s actions. This is a clear case of extrinsic fraud. John’s deception prevented Sarah from presenting her full case to the court. Sarah can file a separate legal action to set aside the judgment. If successful, the original judgment would be vacated, and a new trial could be held.
If you believe you have been a victim of extrinsic fraud, it is essential to act promptly and understand the legal process. The remedy is not to file a regular appeal, as the fraud was not part of the court record. Instead, you would likely need to file a separate legal action—often called an “action in equity” or a “motion to set aside the judgment”—that specifically alleges the fraud.
Caution: The burden of proof for demonstrating extrinsic fraud is high. You must provide clear and convincing evidence that the deception occurred and that it was the reason you were unable to fairly present your case.
Extrinsic Fraud: Deceit that occurs outside the courtroom proceedings, preventing a party from having a fair trial. It is a powerful basis for setting aside a final judgment.
Intrinsic Fraud: Deceit that occurs within the courtroom, such as lying on the stand. It is generally not grounds to overturn a judgment as the court is expected to have addressed it during the trial or on appeal.
A1: Lying on the stand is a form of intrinsic fraud (perjury). While it’s a serious offense, it’s generally not sufficient to set aside a judgment, as the court is presumed to have weighed the credibility of the witness during the trial. The appropriate remedy for this is usually a new trial motion or an appeal, not a separate action for fraud.
A2: There is no single, universally applicable statute of limitations. It depends on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances. However, these actions are usually subject to the doctrine of laches, which means you must file the action within a reasonable time after discovering the fraud.
A3: Yes, a qualified legal expert is essential. Proving extrinsic fraud is a complex legal process that requires a thorough understanding of procedural rules and a high burden of proof. A legal expert can help you evaluate your case, gather evidence, and file the appropriate legal documents to challenge the judgment.
A4: In many legal contexts, a misrepresentation can be a form of fraud. If a misrepresentation is made with the intent to deceive and it prevents a party from presenting their case fairly, it could be considered extrinsic fraud. The key is the intent to deceive and the effect it has on the legal process.
***
Disclaimer: This blog post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The content is AI-generated and should not be considered a substitute for consultation with a qualified legal expert. Laws and procedures regarding fraud and judgments vary by jurisdiction.
Filing & Motions, Petitions, Motions, Briefs, Trials & Hearings, Jury, Bench, Hearings, Appeals, Notice, Appellate Briefs, Oral Arguments, Court Rules, Civil, Contract, Property, Tort, Family, Inheritance, Criminal, Theft, Assault, Fraud, Drug, DUI, Labor & Employment, Wage, Termination, Discrimination, Administrative, Regulatory, Licensing, Immigration, Legal Forms, Contracts, Wills, POA, Affidavits, Checklists, Filing, Trial Prep, Compliance
Understanding Mandatory Drug Trafficking Fines This post details the severe, mandatory minimum fines and penalties…
Understanding Alabama's Drug Trafficking Charges: The Harsh Reality In Alabama, a drug trafficking conviction is…
Meta Description: Understand the legal process for withdrawing a guilty plea in an Alabama drug…
Meta Description: Understand the high stakes of an Alabama drug trafficking charge and the core…
Meta Overview: Facing a repeat drug trafficking charge in Alabama can trigger the state's most…
Consequences Beyond the Cell: How a Drug Trafficking Conviction Impacts Your Alabama Driver's License A…