Categories: Court Info

Enforcing Foreign Judgments: US Recognition Rules.

The Complex Path of Foreign Judgment Recognition

For individuals and businesses involved in international litigation, obtaining a court judgment is only half the battle. The crucial next step is having that judgment legally recognized and enforced in the United States, a process governed by state-specific laws and the principle of international comity, not federal statute or treaty. This post clarifies the standards, mandatory requirements, and procedural steps for having a foreign-country judgment recognized by a U.S. state court.

Introduction: Understanding Comity and State Law

When a court in a foreign nation issues a judgment, that ruling is not automatically enforceable in the United States. Unlike judgments from other U.S. states, which are enforced under the Constitution’s Full Faith and Credit Clause, a foreign-country judgment must go through a formal recognition process governed by the individual laws of the state where enforcement is sought.

The entire framework for recognition is rooted in the principle of international comity, a common law concept established by the Supreme Court in the 1895 case of Hilton v. Guyot. Comity dictates that U.S. courts should recognize foreign judgments where there was an opportunity for a full and fair trial before a competent court with proceedings that align with due process.

The Role of the Uniform Recognition Acts

As there is no bilateral treaty or overarching federal law governing the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of money judgments, most states have adopted one of two models to codify the principles of comity:

Uniform Foreign Money-Judgments Recognition Act (1962 Act): Adopted by a majority of U.S. states, this act provides an expedited procedure for recognizing certain types of foreign judgments.
Uniform Foreign-Country Money Judgments Recognition Act (2005 Act – UFCMJRA): A revised version adopted by a minority of states, which modernized and clarified the grounds for non-recognition.

Key Applicability of the Uniform Acts

These Uniform Acts apply primarily to foreign-country judgments that grant or deny the recovery of a sum of money. They typically exclude judgments related to fines, other penalties, taxes, or domestic relations matters such as divorce, support, or maintenance.

Mandatory Grounds for Non-Recognition

A U.S. state court shall not recognize a foreign judgment if any of the following mandatory grounds apply. These grounds are rooted in fundamental constitutional standards and reflect the basic requirements of due process.

The Absolute Barriers to Recognition

Lack of Due Process System: The judgment was rendered under a judicial system that fails to provide impartial tribunals or procedures compatible with U.S. requirements of due process of law. This requires reviewing the integrity of the foreign judicial system as a whole.
Lack of Personal Jurisdiction: The foreign court lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendant according to U.S. constitutional standards. Recognition will not be refused, however, if the defendant was personally served in the foreign country, voluntarily appeared in the proceeding, or contractually agreed to submit to the foreign court’s jurisdiction.
Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction: The foreign court lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action.

Discretionary Grounds for Non-Recognition

Even if none of the mandatory grounds are met, a state court need not recognize a foreign-country judgment if it finds one of the following discretionary factors to be present:

Ground for Denial	Explanation
Lack of Notice/Inadequate Time	The defendant did not receive notice of the proceeding in sufficient time to enable them to defend their case.
Fraud	The judgment was obtained by fraud that deprived the losing party of an adequate opportunity to present their case.
Public Policy Repugnancy	The judgment or the underlying cause of action is repugnant to the public policy of the state or of the United States.
Conflict with Prior Judgment	The judgment conflicts with another final and conclusive judgment.
Forum Selection Clause	The proceeding in the foreign court was contrary to a valid agreement between the parties (e.g., a dispute resolution clause).
Seriously Inconvenient Forum	In cases where jurisdiction was based solely on personal service, the foreign court was a seriously inconvenient forum for the trial.

The Process of Recognition and Enforcement

The standard procedure for turning a foreign-country judgment into an enforceable U.S. court order requires initiating a new action:

Procedural Steps in a U.S. State Court

File an Action: A party seeking recognition must file an action in a state court seeking recognition of the foreign-country judgment. This is often done by filing an authenticated copy of the judgment and a supporting affidavit.
Notice to Debtor: The judgment creditor must promptly provide notice of the filing to the judgment debtor.
Debtor Objection Period: The judgment debtor is typically given a statutory period (e.g., 30 days in Florida) to file a notice of objection, specifying the grounds for nonrecognition.
Court Review: If an objection is filed, the court holds a hearing to determine if the judgment is entitled to recognition based on the Uniform Act’s standards. The court will not generally re-examine the merits of the case.
Effect of Recognition: Once the foreign judgment is recognized—either by court order or due to the lack of a timely objection—it is treated in the same manner as a judgment of that state and can be enforced using local collection procedures (e.g., liens, writs of execution).

A critical timing issue is the Statute of Limitations. An action to recognize a foreign-country judgment must typically be commenced within the earlier of the time during which the foreign judgment is effective in its original country, or a maximum period set by the state (e.g., 15 years in some states).

Summary of Key Takeaways

Recognition of foreign judgments in the U.S. is not covered by federal law or treaty, but by the laws of the individual state where enforcement is sought.
The process is governed by the principle of international comity and codified primarily by the Uniform Foreign-Country Money Judgments Recognition Act (UFCMJRA).
A foreign judgment must be final, conclusive, and enforceable in its country of origin to qualify for recognition.
Recognition is mandatory unless the debtor proves one of the non-recognition grounds, such as a lack of due process, lack of jurisdiction, or fraud.
Once recognized by a state court, the foreign judgment is treated identically to a domestic state judgment for the purposes of enforcement and collection.

Card Summary: Navigating International Judgment Enforcement

Seeking recognition of a foreign judgment requires careful adherence to the statutory requirements of the specific U.S. state. Due to the complex interplay between common law, state statutes (like the UFCMJRA), and constitutional due process standards, engaging a Legal Expert experienced in international civil litigation is essential. Successfully domesticating a foreign judgment transforms it into a powerful tool for asset collection within the United States.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Does the “Full Faith and Credit Clause” apply to foreign judgments?

A: No. The Full Faith and Credit Clause of the U.S. Constitution requires states to honor the judgments of other U.S. states (“sister-state” judgments). It does not apply to judgments from courts in foreign countries, which are instead recognized under the principles of state law and international comity.

Q: Can a non-money judgment, like an injunction, be recognized under the Uniform Acts?

A: Generally, no. The Uniform Foreign Money-Judgments Recognition Act (UFCMJRA) primarily covers judgments that grant or deny recovery of a sum of money. Recognition of non-money judgments, such as injunctions or declaratory relief, is typically still governed by common law principles of comity, which can be less predictable and more complicated.

Q: What is the biggest hurdle to recognition?

A: The most significant hurdles are typically the mandatory grounds for non-recognition, specifically the lack of personal jurisdiction over the defendant in the foreign court and a failure to meet U.S. due process standards. Debtor-defendants often contest recognition on these grounds.

Q: Can the court re-examine the facts or merits of the case?

A: No. Once a foreign judgment is deemed to have been rendered by a competent court under a fair system, U.S. courts generally will not retry the case or re-examine the merits of the original claim. The review is limited to whether the judgment satisfies the statutory requirements for recognition.

Q: How long does the recognition process usually take?

A: The time can vary significantly by state and whether the debtor contests the judgment. While an unopposed recognition process may take 6–12 months, an opposed action involving appeals and complex proceedings can take 1–5 years.

Disclaimer

This blog post was generated by an AI Legal Blog Post Generator and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. The law governing the recognition of foreign judgments is complex, varies by state, and is subject to frequent change. Always consult with a qualified Legal Expert licensed in the relevant jurisdiction for advice specific to your situation.

Foreign judgment, judgment enforcement, recognition of foreign judgment, Uniform Foreign-Country Money Judgments Recognition Act, UFCMJRA, international comity, due process, personal jurisdiction, subject matter jurisdiction, public policy defense, fraud, final and conclusive, US state law, sister-state judgment, Full Faith and Credit

geunim